Ronan Farrow, HBO Team for Doc About Threats Against This Site And Other Journalists
Ronan Farrow and the directors of the Oscar-nominated Jesus Camp are teaming for an HBO documentary investigating threats against journalists worldwide.
The untitled documentary is the first to go into production under a multi-film deal the Catch and Kill author signed with the premium cable outlet in 2018. The three-year pact calls for him to produce and front a series of investigative documentary specials for HBO.
Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady of Loki Films will direct the film and executive produce with Farrow.
"Around the world, journalists are under fire," said Farrow. "They’re being spied on using new surveillance technology, imprisoned, even murdered. And we’re seeing evolving tactics deployed against reporters in the United States, too, against the backdrop of a new era of misinformation campaigns and rhetoric that seeks to undermine the very idea of objective reporting. I’m so grateful to have the opportunity to work with Rachel, Heidi and HBO to tell these stories."
"We cannot think of a better place than HBO to bring audiences the firsthand stories of reporters taking huge risks in order to fight misinformation and to defend a free and informed society," said Ewing. Grady added, "Reporters covering this upcoming political cycle will be working in a vitriolic, deeply divided country — and our cameras will bear witness to this make or break moment for America’s dedication to a free press."
Farrow was himself the target of surveillance as he reported on sexual assault and harassment allegations against Harvey Weinstein, as he recounts in Catch and Kill. He writes in the book that operatives from private intelligence firm Black Cube compiled dossiers on both Weinstein's accusers and reporters covering the story.
"Now more than ever, as evidenced by Ronan’s recent reporting, unbiased investigative journalism is both essential and under siege,” said HBO Programming president Casey Bloys. "We're excited to provide a platform for Ronan, Heidi and Rachel to shed light on the harrowing circumstances thrust upon journalists in their tireless pursuit of the truth."
Farrow executive produces via his Glass Cannon Inc., in association with Ewing and Grady (HBO's 12th & Delaware, Showtime's upcoming Love Fraud) of Loki Films. Nancy Abraham and Lisa Heller will exec produce for HBO.
The reporters from this site have been attacked using Google's CIA-like intelligence community repression technologies. Every attacker will be exposed!
Nov 15, 2019Until the Ukraine impeachment scandal exploded, the protection of federal whistleblowers was important to Republicans and Democrats alike. That old bipartisan commitment was on display Thursday ...
Are reprisalsagainst the whistleblowers a serious concern? Under the laws governing intelligence community whistleblowers, these whistleblowers are entitled to have their identity kept confidential and are protected againstreprisals by others in the executive branch. However, given the attacks on the whistleblowers by President Trump and ...
Georgia ReprisalAgainstWhistleblowers Lawyer Whistleblowers are individuals who expose activities or information that is deemed unethical, illegal, or incorrect within an organization, entity, or the government.
But the political interference in the whistleblower disclosure process is horrifying. Because if that's not working right, Congress can't do its job of overseeing the executive branch, information is going to dry up; we can't, as a country, engage in governance.
Nov 10, 2019Why do people say it is illegal to name the whistleblower? The whistleblower law protects him from retaliation but does not appear to guarantee anonymity. The WhistleBlower Protection Act does not guarantee anything.
Answer: prohibits reprisalsagainstwhistleblowers by their superiors. Whistleblowers are persons, who report illegal activities by an employer, government or organization. Since whistleblowers may risk retaliation from these groups for disclosing such information, a state and federal protection act for whistleblowers (WPA) was created to protect them.
Nearly every state has laws protecting employees againstwhistleblowerreprisal (WR) and mandates legal penalties, including criminal and civil liability, for engaging in acts resulting in a violation. A whistleblowerreprisal violation is a crime, and the elements of the crime are defined in Kentucky Revised Statute 61.102
Owasanoye noted that the realities and procedure for investigating corruption makes it difficult to fully eradicate reprisalagainstwhistleblowers. He however reassured Nigerians that the current administration has the political will to provide platforms for protecting whistleblowers.
But in some countries, blowing the whistle can carry high personal risk - particularly when there is little legal protection against dismissal, humiliation or even physical abuse. Controls on information, libel and defamation laws, and inadequate investigation of whistleblowers' claims can all deter people from speaking out.
any form of discrimination or harassment against good-faith whistleblowers. This duty includes providing appropriate and timely relief to ameliorate the consequences of actual or threatened reprisals and holding accountable those who retaliate. Attorney fees and associated litigation costs should be available for all who substantially prevail.
A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The Whistleblower Protection Act was made into federal law in the United States in 1989. Whistleblower protection laws and regulations guarantee freedom of speech for workers and contractors in certain situations. Whistleblowers are protected from retaliation for disclosure of information which the employee or appli
Federal employee whistleblowers are protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (WPA) and the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012. Read below for more information about what qualifies as whistleblowing in the federal government, and what actions are considered retaliation for whistleblowing.
The whistleblower complaint that prompted the impeachment inquiry against President Trump also brought attention to the risks faced by those who report misconduct. Brennan Center Fellow Michael German has been a leading national advocate for stronger laws that protect whistleblowers from reprisals ...
Oct 1, 2019Bakaj won DoD's Investigator of the Year award in 2012 for his work on chemical weapons storage. He personally wrote both CIA and DoD agency regulations prohibiting reprisalsagainstwhistleblowers.
Filing a WhistleblowerReprisal Complaint. Whether an unfavorable action was taken or threatened, or a favorable action withheld or threatened to be withheld, is fact-dependent and evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Have documentation for each personnel action available to submit, if available.
Intelligence Community Whistleblower: What NWC Has To Say NWC in the News. Following controversy around an anonymous intelligence community whistleblower complaint, the National Whistleblower Center's Executive Director, Board Chairman, General Counsel, and President have weighed in on the debate.
• Coerce the political activity of any person, or take action against any employee as reprisal for refusing to engage in political activity. EXAMPLE: Supervisor Jane takes away significant job duties of Employee Jack because Jack will not make a contribution to Jane's favorite candidate. • Deceive or willfully obstruct any person from
Sep 24, 2019The current whistleblower, moreover, has been ridiculed by the President of the United States as a "political person" carrying out a "political hack job," and dismissed by Fox News as one ...
Nov 6, 2019Federal laws protect whistleblowers from reprisal in order to encourage employees to report corruption, lawbreaking and unethical conduct. ... to stir emotions in a political climate with "a lot ...
• The Whistleblower Protection Act prohibits Federal agencies from retaliating against employees, former employees, or applicants for employment for whistle blowing. Whistleblowerreprisal refers to the actual taking, failure to take, or threatened taking of a personnel action in retaliation for a protected disclosure of information that
Externally, a whistleblower can bring allegations to light by contacting a third party outside of an accused organization such as the media, government, law enforcement, or those who are concerned. Whistleblowers, however, take the risk of facing stiff reprisal and retaliation from those who are accused or alleged of wrongdoing.
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 42:1169(A) "Any public employee who reports to a person or entity of competent authority or jurisdiction information which he reasonably believes indicates a violation of any law or of any order, rule, or regulation issued in accordance with law or any other alleged acts of impropriety related to the scope or duties of public employment or public office within any ...
Oct 18, 2019In disclosing the contents of the phone call and efforts to hide the full transcript, the Ukraine whistleblowers are presented as organizational defenders, protecting the national interest against corrupt presidential behavior. This fits within deliberately narrow state definitions of whistleblowing against "waste, fraud, and abuse."
This project combinesCrowdsourced Forensics,top former and current FBI, CIA, GAO & SEC officers, 60 Minutes-class investigative reporters and open-source collaborative AI software to END CORRUPTION IN AMERICA!
These transparency sites auto-mirror themselves globally on open server space. Billions of average citizens are learning and practicing private investigation techniques and sharing 100% legal P2P anti-corruption methods and transparency practices to help erase political corruption. We have a 100% take-down rate on our targets.
We Are THE NETWORK!
Department of Energy Staff (ie: Chu), White House Staff (ie: Emanual), CIA staff (ie: Woolsey) owned the rare earth (ie: lithium, indium) mining scam stock (ie: Goldman Sachs transfers) market securities from foreign countries (ie: Afghanistan) which only benefited themselves, Elon Musk and his Silicon Valley Cartel.
OUR DEMAND FOR JUSTICE!
Who owes us payments for our damages, whistle-blower fees, Constitutional rights violations, losses and harms?
US-DOJ, US-SSA, US-SEC, US-FTC, US-DOE must pay us
What are we demanding:
1.) Our Legal Counsel provision rights, 2.) a jury trial to secure our damages, 3.) an end to the politically sponsored cover-up, 4.) a public Senate hearing and 5.) delivery of the FBI-302 reports to Congress!
We have been blockaded from those rights because famous politicians are embarrassed by the FBI-class evidence we have!
- Famous political figures use the trillions of dollars in government treasuries and the stock market for illicit profiteering by rigging the system exclusively for themselves and their crony insiders.
- They attacked us using government taxpayer funded media (Fusion GPS, Black Cube, Google, Pysops, Gizmodo, Media Matters, Blumenthal, etc.) and spy agency tools because we competed with their businesses and reported their crimes.
- San Francisco Bay Area government has as many corrupt politicians as Chicago and relies on the same RICO-violating insider corruption network to operate; as proven by deep AI searches of their financial records. Arrests of those officials is now underway.
- Silicon Valley law enforcement records prove that these tech oligarchs engage in an organized, racketeering-based, massive sex trafficking, tax evasion, anti-trust violating, spousal abuse, money laundering, black-listing, racist, ageist, political bribery, crony racketeering crime Cartel.
- Famous U.S. Senators, Governors and their staff knowingly engage in, finance, operate and benefit from these crimes in exchange for search engine manipulation and stock market assets.
- Silicon Valley and Hollywood media companies censor and cover-up news coverage of these crimes because they have a financial connection to the perpetrators.
- Most of the government officials working on our case were hand-picked by our business adversaries. Our case has never been fairly reviewed by non-biased, non-conflicted officials. Our FBI-class associates have not found a single entity in our case reviews, or determinations, who was not either: financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; one of those business adversaries, or the Senators and politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital services to.
FOLLOW AND SHARE THE WEBCASTS:
JOIN MILLIONS OF VIEWERS AROUND THE GLOBE AT THE CASE WEBCAST AT
We Reported This Crime To These Officials And They Did Nothing To Help Us!
We sent certified letters, time stamped emails, fed-ex reports, tracked USPS documents, FBI-FD-302 drafts, broadcast news reports and filed federal multiple lawsuits that are on public record. Many of these officials did NOTHING to help us and everything to stonewall and cover-up the crimes because many of them are engaged in the bribes, kick-backs, payola, revolving doors, search engine rigging, black-lists, stock market insider trading and securities protection rackets. Now we are making certain that every member of the public has these facts by delivering this information to 100,000, or more, different voter and citizens per day. We have digital proof of receipt with the following parties:
Senator Dianne Feinstein
Bill Cooper, U.S. Department of Energy General Counsel
San Francisco FBI officer Patricia Rich
San Francisco FBI office, 450 Golden Gate, Duty Officer
San Francisco FBI office Director David Johnson
San Francisco Police Department, Case # receipt received
San Mateo Police Department, Public Record
42 Different officials at GAO per their direct emails
16 different officials at the SEC per their direct emails
Secretary of Energy Moniz
Senator Nancy Pelosi
Senator Jared Huffman
Margrethe Vestager, EU
Rep. Jackie Speier
Jerry Brown’s Justice Department Lead: Ken Alex
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
FBI Director James Comey
DOJ - Inspector General
Cecelia Howell, Office of Investor Education & Advocacy, SEC
Department of Energy Inspector General
Secretary of Energy Steven Chu
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs
White House Advisor David Axelrod
California Attorney General Kamala Harris
Senator Barbara Boxer
California Secretary of State’s Office
California Crime Victims Board – vcgcb.ca.gov
United States Department of Justice – Obama Administration
FBI – Obama Administration
SEC – Obama Administration
CFTC – Obama Administration
Secret Service – Obama Administration
Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General
Rebecca Alery, Staffer to Congressman Emmer
Carly Atchison, Communications Director to Congressman Emmer
Trey Gowdy - U.S. Congress
Anti-trust Office, USDOJ
Abbey Rime, press organizer for Congressman Tom Rime
Citizen Complaint Center, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice
Paul Kangas, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Micheal Arrington, The Other Half of the FBI, Peter T., Tim Redmond, Marita Noon, Christine L, Gary D. Conley, Seth Rich, Rajeeve Motwani, Aaron Hillel Swartz, The ACLU, Art Agnos, Dodie Rosekrans, The Former Intelligence Officers Of America, Henry Dakin, The Dakin Project, Chet Helms, The Brown Estate, Tom P., Tim D., Planetree, DuckDuckgo, CERN, Linux Foundation, Mercer Fund, COA, Judicial Watch, John F. Bennett, Craig D. Fair, Christopher Wray and the crowd-sourced members of the public assisting in this effort to end political corruption in America!